Gerald Lee Repasz Audit (2023) – A Scam or Legit Broker?

Gerald Lee Repasz  – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.

Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Gerald Lee Repasz.

BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Gerald Lee Repasz. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.

About Gerald Repasz

Gerald Lee Repasz is an Investment Adviser. Gerald Lee Repasz’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 1273452 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/1273452.

Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Gerald Lee Repasz.

Gerald Lee Repasz has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.

Accusations and Disclosures

You can find below, a quick snapshot of Gerald Lee Repasz’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.

DISCLOSURE 1 – 

• Event Date: 2/7/2022
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Pending
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: The clients allege through their attorney in 2007-2013 the representative sold them unsuitable investments and misrepresented the investments to the clients. They further allege the representative falsified their net worth and investment risk tolerance to justify the purchases on their account suitability forms.
• Damage Amount Requested: $170,000.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 2 – 

• Event Date: 12/28/2021
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Pending
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Unsuitable investments; misrepresentation of client net worth and investment risk
• Damage Amount Requested: $170,000.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 3 – 

• Event Date: 4/2/2020
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Unsuitable investments
• Damage Amount Requested: $100,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $5,000.00
• Broker Comment: The U4 filing for the initial client complaint was inadvertently not filed by firm in 2016. Original complaint was closed with no action by the firm. Initial client complaint reviewed by FINRA. Complainant is now requesting arbitration as of 3.27.2020. Updating DRP to include original complaint and arbitration request.

DISCLOSURE 4 – 

• Event Date: 10/24/2017
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Client alleges unsuitable investments in UDF III and IV and seeks $62,000 in damages. Client also alleges losses in Behringer Harvard REIT. However, purchases of most of UDF III and all of the REIT were made prior to Mr. Repasz joining Ausdal. Investments in UDF III and IV as listed equities were made through Ausdal, in September and November 2015, for a total $10,500. Client has entered a settlement agreement with Berthel Fischer and Mr. Repasz for investments made at Berthel.
• Damage Amount Requested: $62,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $26,500.00
• Arbitration Docket Number: 17-02791

DISCLOSURE 5 – 

• Event Date: 9/21/2016
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Client alleges that the alternative investments that he purchased between 2005-2010 were unsuitable and misrepresented to him by the representative. The client also alleges that the firm failed to supervise the actions of the representative.
• Damage Amount Requested: $100,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $20,000.00
• Broker Comment: THIS COMPLAINT WAS SETTLED TO AVOID ADDITIONAL LITIGATION EXPENSES. I DISAGREE WITH THE CLIENT ALLEGATIONS.

DISCLOSURE 6 – 

• Event Date: 12/1/2011
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Denied
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIAMANTS ALLEGE THE INVESTMENT WAS UNSUITABLE AND MISREPRESENTED. CLAIMANT ALSO ALLEGES THE FIRM FAILED TO SUPERVISE AND CONDUCT ADEQUATE DUE DILIGENCE.
• Damage Amount Requested: $2,028,000.00
• Broker Comment: CLIAMANTS’ CLAIMS, EACH AND ALL, ARE HEREBY DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DISCLOSURE 7 – 

• Event Date: 6/24/2011
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Closed-No Action
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLIENT ALLEGES SHE WAS MISLED BY THE REPRESENTATIVE AND THAT THE INVESTMENTS WERE MISREPRESENTED TO HER. CLIENT ALSO ALLEGES THE FIRM DID NOT PROPERLY SUPERVISE THE ACTIONS OF THE REPRESENTATIVE.
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 8 – 

• Event Date: 6/16/2005
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Denied
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: MISREPRESENTATION OF SURRENDER FEES
• Damage Amount Requested: $186,000.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.

FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.

Previous Associations

Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.

• AUSDAL FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. (CRD#: 7995) :: 6/24/2013 – 7/1/2020 :: East Peoria, IL
• BERTHEL, FISHER & COMPANY FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (CRD#: 13609) :: 7/22/2002 – 6/24/2013 :: PEORIA, IL
• SII INVESTMENTS, INC. (CRD#: 2225) :: 2/18/1998 – 7/24/2002 :: APPLETON, WI
• SII INVESTMENTS, INC. (CRD#: 2225) :: 1/27/1998 – 2/18/1998
• FORTIS INVESTORS, INC. (CRD#: 421) :: 2/5/1992 – 1/30/1998 :: OAKDALE, MN
• MIDAMERICA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (CRD#: 13302) :: 3/7/1985 – 2/7/1992 :: CEDAR RAPIDS, IA

The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.

Legit or Not?

Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Gerald Lee Repasz, but not limited to)  can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.

Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.

There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –

• Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
• Unauthorized Trading
• Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
• Excessive Trading (Churning)
• Lack of Diversification
• Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
• Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
• Front Running of Transactions
• Breakpoint Sale Violations
• Negligent Portfolio Management

Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet. 

How to Protect Yourself

We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.

Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –

• Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
• Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
• Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
• Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
• Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
• Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.

Report Gerald Repasz

In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.

Gerald Lee Repasz – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.

Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →

This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:

• Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
• The CRD number (1273452) for the broker – Gerald Lee Repasz
• Your complete contact information.

Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint.  Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.

The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘Ripoff Repairs LLC,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.

This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.

To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/gerald-lee-repasz/.