Jamie Raymond Gittins Audit (2023) – A Scam or Legit Broker?

Jamie Raymond Gittins  – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.

Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Jamie Raymond Gittins.

BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Jamie Raymond Gittins. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.

About Jamie Gittins

Jamie Raymond Gittins is an Investment Adviser. Jamie Raymond Gittins’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 222475 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/222475.

Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Jamie Raymond Gittins.

Jamie Raymond Gittins has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.

Accusations and Disclosures

You can find below, a quick snapshot of Jamie Raymond Gittins’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.

DISCLOSURE 1 – 

• Event Date: 6/24/2014
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CLAIMANTS ALLEGE THAT RR ENGAGED IN CHURNING AND UNAUTHORIZED TRADING IN THIS ACCOUNT FROM 2008 TO ACCOUNT CLOSE.
• Damage Amount Requested: $100,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $75,000.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 2 – 

• Event Date: 7/9/2013
• Disclosure Type: Employment Separation After Allegations
• Disclosure Resolution:
• Disclosure Detail :: Firm Name: FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC.
• Termination Type: Discharged
• Allegations: REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE VIOLATED FIRM POLICY BY PLACING TRADES IN A CLIENT ACCOUNT OUTSIDE THE BROKER/DEALER.

DISCLOSURE 3 – 

• Event Date: 7/9/2013
• Disclosure Type: Employment Separation After Allegations
• Disclosure Resolution:
• Disclosure Detail :: Firm Name: FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC.
• Termination Type: Discharged
• Allegations: INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE VIOLATED FIRM POLICY BY PLACING TRADES IN CLIENT ACCOUNT OUTSIDE AFFILIATE BROKER/DEALER.

DISCLOSURE 4 – 

• Event Date: 9/30/2001
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: CUSTOMER ALLEGES POOR PERFORMANCE.
• Damage Amount Requested: $100,000.00
• Arbitration Claim File Detail: 02-01301
• Broker Comment: THE MATTER WAS SETTLED IN MEDIATION. THE AGREEMENT WAS $60,000. THE BROKER WAS NOT ASKED TO PARTICIPATE IN LEGAL FEES OR SETTLEMENT PAYMENT.

DISCLOSURE 5 – 

• Event Date: 11/5/1997
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Denied
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: A CUSTOMER COMPLAINT FILED BY ROBERT FERGUSON ALLEGED UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS WITH A PURPORTED LOSS OF APPROX $5,000.
• Damage Amount Requested: $4,290.00
• Broker Comment: THE CASE WAS CLOSED WITH NO WRONGDOING ON THE PART OF THE I.E., AND THERE WAS NO COMPENSATION WHATSOEVER TO THE PLAINTIFF. THE PLAINTIFF ALLEGED UNSUITABLE INVESTMENTS. THE INVESTMENT INCLUDED 3 SEPARATE PURCHASES OF A STOCK OVER APPROX 2 YEARS. THE FIRST PURCHASE OF 200 SHARES AT APPROX $16 PER SHARE, WAS SOLICITED BY THE I.E. THE SECOND PURCHASE (300 MORE SHARES OF SAME STOCK AT APPROX $8 PER SHARE) WAS AN UNSOLICITED TRADE APPROX 18 MONTHS LATER, WITH A SUBSEQUENT UNSOLICITED PURCHASE A FEW MONTHS LATER OF AN ADDITIONAL 200 SHARES AT APPROX $8. ALMOST 2 YEARS AFTER THE ACCOUNT WAS ASSIGNED TO ANOTHER I.E. (BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL I.E. HAD LEFT THE FIRM), THE CLIENT COMPLAINED THAT IT WAS AN UNSUITABLE INVESTMENT. THE PLAINTIFF KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING; AS A LICENSED INSURANCE AND SECURITIES REP, HE WAS FAR MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE THAN THE AVERAGE INVESTOR.

DISCLOSURE 6 – 

• Event Date: 9/2/1994
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Award / Judgment
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: ALLEGATIONS: SUITABILITY, MISREPRESENTATION, CHURNING, BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY. SECURITIES INVOLVED: COMMON STOCK, OPTIONS. TOTAL DAMAGES STATED: $850,000.00
• Damage Amount Requested: $500,000.00
• Arbitration Claim File Detail: 94-02996
• Broker Comment: ARBITRATION WAS WITHDRAWN Not Provided

DISCLOSURE 7 – 

• Event Date: 8/11/1994
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: GITTINS, THE FORMER BRANCH MANAGER, IS THE SUBJECT OF MULTI-PARTY STATE COURT ACTION AGAINST THE FIRM ONLY, ALLEGING THAT THE FIRM FAILED TO SUPERVISE FORMER RR JAMES PARKER IN THE SALE OF $162,215.67 IN ALLEGING UNSUITABLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND LOW PRICED STOCKS.
• Damage Amount Requested: $162,215.67
• Settlement Amount: $600,000.00
• Broker Comment: SETTLEMENT WAS REACHED. I DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO ANY SETTLEMENT NOR WAS I ASKED TO CONTRIBUTE TO ANY SETTLEMENT. I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE JURGENSON MATTER. REGISTERED REP JAMES PARKER WAS UNDER MY SUPERVISION FOR ONLY A COUPLE OF MONTHS IN 1983. I FEEL THAT BEING NAMED IN THIS SUIT IS SOLELY BECAUSE I WAS THE ACTING MANAGER FOR PRUDENTIAL IN THE INITIAL START UP OF THE GOLD RIVER OFFICE IN AUGUST 1983 WHEN THE REGISTERED REP JIM PARKER JOINED PRUDENTIAL BACHE SECURITIES. I FEEL I SUPERVISED THE OFFICE PROPERLY AT ALL TIMES AND COMPLIED WITH ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS.

DISCLOSURE 8 – 

• Event Date: 1/24/1991
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: I WAS NAMED AS A RESPONDENT SOLELY IN MY SACRAMENTO OFFICE.
• Damage Amount Requested: $340,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $170,000.00
• Broker Comment: I EXCHANGED MUTUAL RELEASES WITH [CUSTOMER CONSTRUCTION INC. AND [CUSTOMER, INDIVIDUALLY [CUSTOMER HAS SUBSTANTIAL PRIOR INVESTMENT EXPERIENCE INCLUDING HUGE INVESTMENTS IN LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS. MUCH OF THE CLAIM AROSE FROM TWO RISER INVESTMENTS WHICH WERE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY INTEREST RATES. [CUSTOMER’S 1ST COMPLAINT WAS MADE MORE THAN A YR AFTER THE DISPUTED TRANSACTIONS. I SPOKE WITH [CUSTOMER ABOUT THE CLAIMS AND ALSO WROTE HIM. THE CLAIM AGAINST ME WAS UTTERLY WITHOUT MERIT AND I EXCHANGED MUTUAL RELEASES WITH [CUSTOMER CONSTRUCTIONS, INC. AND [CUSTOMER INDIVIDUALLY.

According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.

FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.

Previous Associations

Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.

• FIRST ALLIED SECURITIES, INC. (CRD#: 32444) :: 7/17/2006 – 8/6/2013 :: GRANITE BAY, CA
• INVESTORS RESOURCES GROUP, INC. (CRD#: 45752) :: 10/17/2003 – 7/17/2006 :: VACAVILLE, CA
• INTERCAL SECURITIES CO. (CRD#: 6284) :: 5/1/2002 – 11/14/2003 :: SACRAMENTO, CA
• SUTRO & CO. INCORPORATED (CRD#: 801) :: 7/17/1998 – 10/18/2001 :: SAN FRANCISCO, CA
• INTERCAL SECURITIES CO. (CRD#: 6284) :: 2/13/1996 – 7/22/1998 :: SACRAMENTO, CA
• PIPER JAFFRAY INC. (CRD#: 665) :: 11/3/1993 – 2/8/1996 :: MINNEAPOLIS, MN
• PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED (CRD#: 8174) :: 10/3/1991 – 10/26/1993 :: WEEHAWKEN, NJ
• PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INCORPORATED (CRD#: 7471) :: 8/2/1978 – 10/3/1991 :: NEW YORK, NY
• SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM & CO., INCORPORATED (CRD#: 7059) :: 8/6/1976 – 9/8/1978
• E. F. HUTTON & COMPANY INC (CRD#: 235) :: 3/15/1973 – 9/7/1976

The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.

Legit or Not?

Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Jamie Raymond Gittins, but not limited to)  can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.

Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.

There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –

• Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
• Unauthorized Trading
• Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
• Excessive Trading (Churning)
• Lack of Diversification
• Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
• Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
• Front Running of Transactions
• Breakpoint Sale Violations
• Negligent Portfolio Management

Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet. 

How to Protect Yourself

We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.

Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –

• Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
• Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
• Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
• Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
• Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
• Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.

Report Jamie Gittins

In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.

Jamie Raymond Gittins – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.

Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →

This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:

• Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
• The CRD number (222475) for the broker – Jamie Raymond Gittins
• Your complete contact information.

Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint.  Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.

The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘Ripoff Repairs LLC,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.

This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.

To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/jamie-raymond-gittins/.