Jeffrey Scott Ingros Audit (2023) – A Scam or Legit Broker?

Jeffrey Scott Ingros  – and the firm that employs him or her – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

If you are like most people, before you go out to dinner at a new restaurant, you probably take a quick look at the reviews. This makes sense; you are going to pay for an expensive dinner, and you need to be sure that you are getting a good value.

Yet, when choosing a financial advisor, many people fail to conduct this same level of due diligence. Before turning over access to your money, you need to be sure that you have found a financial advisor that you can trust. Here, our audit report, including details of allegations, complaints, and sanctions will help you decide whether or not to invest with Jeffrey Scott Ingros.

BrokerComplaints.com is currently investigating allegations related to Jeffrey Scott Ingros. We provide a free platform for investors to help them in their claims against negligent brokers and brokerage firms.

About Jeffrey Ingros

Jeffrey Scott Ingros is an Investment Adviser. Jeffrey Scott Ingros’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) number is 2091822 and the FINRA Profile can be found at – https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/2091822.

Click here to download a Detailed Audit Report for Jeffrey Scott Ingros.

Jeffrey Scott Ingros has previously been reprimanded and has disclosures and/or client dispute(s) listed at FINRA BrokerCheck.

Accusations and Disclosures

You can find below, a quick snapshot of Jeffrey Scott Ingros’s regulatory actions, arbitrations, and complaints.

DISCLOSURE 1 – 

• Event Date: 8/19/2021
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: The customer alleges unsuitable investment recommendations, misrepresentations and omissions of material fact .
• Damage Amount Requested: $28,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $24,999.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 2 – 

• Event Date: 8/30/2016
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Denied
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Clients expressed concern regarding the suitability of an investment and alleged it was misrepresented to them by their Financial Advisor
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 3 – 

• Event Date: 8/9/2016
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Denied
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Client expressed concern regarding the suitability of an investment she purchased and also alleges the risk of it was not explained by her Financial Advisor.
• Damage Amount Requested: $34,645.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 4 – 

• Event Date: 5/3/2016
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Denied
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Client alleges that the Financial Advisor did not accurately disclose the terms and conditions of a life insurance policy that the client purchased in March 2006.
• Damage Amount Requested: $231,220.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 5 – 

• Event Date: 3/23/2016
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: Negligence; Violations of Pennsylvania Securities Law; Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Fraud; Brach of Contract; Suitability; Negligent Management of the Accounts and Registered Representative; Respondeat Superior
• Damage Amount Requested: $200,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $121,873.00
• Arbitration Docket Number:

DISCLOSURE 6 – 

• Event Date: 3/11/2016
• Disclosure Type: Regulatory
• Disclosure Resolution: Final
• Disclosure Detail :: DocketNumberFDA: 2013039166001
• DocketNumberAAO: 2013039166001
• Initiated By: FINRA
• Allegations: Without admitting or denying the findings, Ingros consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he refused to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA during its investigation into allegations that he accepted undisclosed loans from customers and engaged in outside business activities.
• Resolution: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
• Sanction Details :: Sanctions: Bar (Permanent)
• Sanction Details :: Registration Capacities Affected: All Capacities
• Duration: Indefinite
• Start Date: 3/11/2016

DISCLOSURE 7 – 

• Event Date: 2/19/2016
• Disclosure Type: Employment Separation After Allegations
• Disclosure Resolution:
• Disclosure Detail :: Firm Name: RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES
• Termination Type: Permitted to Resign
• Allegations: Financial Advisor disclosed to the firm that he accepted loans from customers without prior written approval from the firm. Financial Advisor also failed to disclose the loans on the annual compliance attestations.

DISCLOSURE 8 – 

• Event Date: 2/19/2016
• Disclosure Type: Employment Separation After Allegations
• Disclosure Resolution:
• Disclosure Detail :: Firm Name: RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES ADVISORS
• Termination Type: Permitted to Resign
• Allegations: Financial Advisor disclosed to the firm that he accepted loans from customers without prior written approval from the firm. Financial Advisor also failed to disclose the loans on the annual compliance attestations

DISCLOSURE 9 – 

• Event Date: 10/21/2015
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: The Customer alleges unsuitable investment recommendations, unauthorized trading, misrepresentation and borrowing money from the Customer from May 2007 to October 2013.
• Damage Amount Requested: $1,724,854.00
• Settlement Amount: $730,000.00
• Broker Comment: I vehemently deny the allegations made in the complaint made on behalf of a deceased customer. The complaint was not addressed to me and was sent to Merrill Lynch concerning account activity that took place years ago.

DISCLOSURE 10 – 

• Event Date: 1/30/2014
• Disclosure Type: Customer Dispute
• Disclosure Resolution: Settled
• Disclosure Detail :: Allegations: THE CUSTOMER ALLEGES UNAUTHORIZED TRADING, UNSUITABLE INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND MISREPRESENTATION FROM SEPTEMBER 2007 TO OCTOBER 2013.
• Damage Amount Requested: $55,000.00
• Settlement Amount: $51,000.00
• Arbitration Docket Number: 14-03183
• Broker Comment: I HAVE KNOWN [CUSTOMER AND MANAGED CERTAIN OF HER INVESTMENTS FOR IN EXCESS OF 20 YEARS. [CUSTOMER MONITORED HER ACCOUNTS ON-LINE, AS WELL AS THROUGH PERSONAL VISITS, TELEPHONE CALLS, EMAILS, AND FREQUENTLY SEEING HER AT CHURCH. FOR ALMOST THE LAST 3 YEARS, [CUSTOMER’S ACCOUNT WAS ENROLLED IN THE MERRILL LYNCH MUTUAL FUND ADVISOR DISCRETIONARY PLATFORM SINCE JUNE 10, 2011. I PLACED NO TRADES IN THE ACCOUNT SINCE THIS DATE. PRIOR TO ENROLLMENT IN THIS PROGRAM [CUSTOMER WAS INVOLVED IN EVERY INVESTMENT DECISION MADE IN HER PORTFOLIO WHICH INCLUDED OPEN-END MUTUAL FUNDS, CLOSED-END MUTUAL FUNDS, INDIVIDUAL STOCKS AND COVERED CALL WRITING ONLY ON STOCK SHE OWNED. I BELIEVE [CUSTOMER COMPLAINED AFTER MY DEPARTURE AND ONLY AFTER MERRILL LYNCH INFORMED HER THAT HER $14,000 ACCOUNT WAS TOO SMALL AND THAT SHE SHOULD TRANSFER IT ELSEWHERE.

According to a study prepared for the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, 80 percent of American investors report that they have been solicited to participate in a fraud scheme, while 11 percent of American investors report that they personally lost money as a result of fraud.

FINRA notes that the rate of investment fraud is most likely much higher than it is reported. This is because many victims of financial advisor scams are too ashamed to come forward. Further, the study also found that a significant number of investors do not know how to spot common red flags of investment fraud. The least you should do is share your experience with other potential victims of investment scams.

Previous Associations

Under federal securities law and securities industry regulations, registered investment firms have a legal duty to supervise their financial advisors. Section 15(b)(4)(E) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 makes a securities firm liable for the conduct of representatives.

• RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. (CRD#: 6694) :: 11/6/2013 – 2/24/2016 :: BEAVER, PA
• MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED (CRD#: 7691) :: 5/14/2007 – 11/14/2013 :: BEAVER, PA
• JANNEY MONTGOMERY SCOTT LLC (CRD#: 463) :: 11/3/1997 – 6/8/2007 :: BEAVER, PA
• ADVEST, INC. (CRD#: 10) :: 3/2/1992 – 11/19/1997 :: HARTFORD, CT
• METLIFE SECURITIES INC. (CRD#: 14251) :: 1/7/1991 – 3/23/1992 :: SPRINGFIELD, MA
• METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (CRD#: 4095) :: 1/7/1991 – 3/23/1992 :: NEW YORK, NY

The duty to supervise securities representatives is a strong legal requirement. Registered investment firms must take many different steps to ensure that they are protecting their customers from irresponsible and criminal financial advisors.

Legit or Not?

Unfortunately, stockbroker fraud is more common than many investors would like to think. And yes, stockbrokers (including Jeffrey Scott Ingros, but not limited to)  can (and do) steal money from their clients. While it’s rare that a broker will literally steal his client’s money (though that does happen), typically the “theft” of investment funds comes in the form of other fraudulent violations of securities law and FINRA rules which leads to significant investment losses.

Investors generally understand that there are risks associated with buying and selling securities. The market can go up, and the market can go down. No matter how skilled of an investor you are, there are always risks. With that being said, sometimes investment losses cannot be blamed on simple back luck.

There are 10 major types of complaints we receive against Investment Brokers –

• Outright Theft (Conversion of Funds)
• Unauthorized Trading
• Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Facts
• Excessive Trading (Churning)
• Lack of Diversification
• Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
• Failure to Disclose a Personal Conflict of Interest
• Front Running of Transactions
• Breakpoint Sale Violations
• Negligent Portfolio Management

Do your due diligence before investing. Public records are available for everybody to review and decide on the safest bet. 

How to Protect Yourself

We, as citizens, place a great deal of trust in the financial advisors who are tasked with helping us achieve and maintain financial security. Most of the time financial advisors and stockbrokers are honest folks who work diligently in their client’s best interests. However, on occasion financial advisors and the brokerage firms who employ them mess up and cause serious financial harm to their clients. Sometimes these losses are caused by simple negligence. Other times fraud or other serious misconduct is to blame.

Here are 5 signs that your broker needs to be reported –

• Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, certain investment professionals, known as registered investment advisors (RIAs), owe fiduciary obligations to their customers. Your investment broker must always look out for your best interests. If you lost money because of your broker’s breach of fiduciary duty, you may be entitled to compensation for the full value of your damages.
• Unsuitable Investments: Many financial advisors are not fiduciaries. Instead, they are held to the suitability standard. These stockbrokers and financial advisors can only sell and recommend financial products that are appropriate for a customer’s unique investment profile. If you lost money in unsuitable investments, you should consider reporting them.
• Material Misrepresentations or Omissions: Brokers have a duty to make fair and honest representations to their clients. If they fail to do so, and an investor loses money due to a misrepresentation or a material omission, the broker may be liable for the investor’s losses.
• Lack of Diversification: Brokers must also act with the appropriate level of professional skill. Pushing a customer into over-concentrated investments is highly risky. Brokers can be held liable for losses sustained because of an investor’s inappropriate lack of diversification.
• Excessive Trading (Churning): Stockbrokers and financial advisors must have a well-grounded, reasonable basis to execute all trades. Unfortunately, there are cases in which brokers will frequently trade on a customer’s account, simply to increase their own fees. This unlawful practice is known as churning.
• Unauthorized Trading: Brokers must have the proper legal authority to make transactions on behalf of a client. If you lost money because your broker made trades that you never approved of, you may have been the victim of unauthorized trading. You should consult with an experienced attorney.

Report Jeffrey Ingros

In order to prevail in an investment fraud lawsuit or FINRA arbitration cases, you must be able to assert a viable ‘cause of action’.

Jeffrey Scott Ingros – and the firm that employs this broker – is regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA provides an online form to allow investors to file a formal complaint against their financial advisor, stockbroker, or brokerage firm.

Click here to go to FINRA’s Online Complaint Form →

This form will ask you for specific information related to your complaint. Be prepared by gathering the following:

• Name and symbol for the investment product in question.
• The CRD number (2091822) for the broker – Jeffrey Scott Ingros
• Your complete contact information.

Remember, it is advised to report your broker to FINRA, only after you have exhausted all of your other remedies and carefully prepared a compelling complaint.  Once you file a complaint against your broker at FINRA, your case will be bound by FINRA’s rules and the arbitration panel’s eventual decision. The time clock will start, and your complaint will be served on your broker or broker-dealer.

The views and opinions expressed in these articles are those of the source BrokerComplaints.com and do not necessarily reflect the official position of ‘Ripoff Repairs LLC,’ which shall not be held liable for any inaccuracies presented. The information provided within this article is for general informational purposes only. While we try to keep the information up-to-date and correct, there are no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability of the information in this article for any purpose.

This article is syndicated automatically through a third-party agency from BrokerComplaints.com.

To view the original article at BrokerComplaints.com, you can visit https://brokercomplaints.com/report/jeffrey-scott-ingros/.